- Make each quote’s owner, status, approved version and next action visible.
- Keep the existing order system as the authoritative order record.
- Treat the stages as planning assumptions; the example implies no delivery dates or achieved outcomes.

Illustrative work / 03
Technology roadmap
A gated plan for a shared quote-to-order queue, connecting dependencies and acceptance criteria with business, data and support ownership.
The scenario
A fictional B2B distributor receives quote requests through email. Sales, pricing, supply planning and order management share responsibility, but use separate records. These are scenario assumptions, not findings from client work.
- Define the user task and information boundary before selecting a tool.
- Advance through evidence gates with explicit dependencies and acceptance criteria.
- Agree data, support and expansion ownership before the pilot grows.
A useful first increment
Stages and decision gates
- 01
Define the user task
Business and operations owners agree the workflow, measures and unresolved requirements before concept work advances.
- 02
Test the concept
Product and technology owners validate tool capability and data needs. Intended users complete normal and exception tasks in a prototype.
- 03
Configure a bounded increment
Delivery and data owners resolve roles, field mappings and the order-system handoff. Acceptance, access and reconciliation checks pass.
- 04
Pilot and hand over
Operations and support owners prepare trained users, a baseline and an operating runbook. The sponsor decides to extend, revise or stop.
Information ownership
- Sales operations
- Own request identifiers, next-owner assignments and recorded status changes.
- Pricing and planning leads
- Keep approval, source and validity with the quote version; do not silently overwrite.
- Order management
- Link customer acceptance to the final quote and reconcile it with the authoritative order record.
Acceptance and continued operation
- Users can trace a released order to an accepted quote and understand the next action.
- Changes reopen affected reviews; permitted access and recoverable handoff failures are demonstrated.
- Support maintains access, triage and recovery instructions. Data owners resolve quality issues; the product owner records scope decisions.
- Expansion depends on accepted criteria, observed use, control exceptions, support demand and agreed continuing responsibilities.
How to read this example
- Illustrative example. Fictional scenario. Not client work.
- The roadmap demonstrates sequencing and ownership; it is not a product commitment.
- Actual engagement deliverables depend on evidence and agreed scope.
Bring your context
What would this look
like in your business?
Use this example to frame a conversation about the decision, workflow or technology challenge in front of you.
Discuss your challengeDownload the example